This paper shows the endogeneity of amenities plays a crucial role in determining the welfare distribution of a city's residents. We quantify this mechanism by building a dynamic model of residential choice with heterogeneous households, where consumption amenities are the equilibrium outcome of a market for non‐tradables. We estimate our model using Dutch microdata and leveraging variation in Amsterdam's spatial distribution of tourists as a demand shifter, finding significant heterogeneity in residents' preferences over amenities and in the supply responses of amenities to changes in demand composition. This two‐way heterogeneity dictates the degree of horizontal differentiation across neighborhoods, residential sorting, and inequality. Finally, we show the distributional effects of mass tourism depend on this heterogeneity: following rent increases due to growing tourist demand for housing, younger residents—whose amenity preferences are closest to tourists—are compensated by amenities tilting in their favor, while the losses of older residents are amplified.
MLA
Almagro, Milena, and Tomás Domínguez‐Iino. “Location Sorting and Endogenous Amenities: Evidence from Amsterdam.” Econometrica, vol. 93, .no 3, Econometric Society, 2025, pp. 1031-1071, https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA21394
Chicago
Almagro, Milena, and Tomás Domínguez‐Iino. “Location Sorting and Endogenous Amenities: Evidence from Amsterdam.” Econometrica, 93, .no 3, (Econometric Society: 2025), 1031-1071. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA21394
APA
Almagro, M., & Domínguez‐Iino, T. (2025). Location Sorting and Endogenous Amenities: Evidence from Amsterdam. Econometrica, 93(3), 1031-1071. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA21394
Supplement to "Location Sorting and Endogenous Amenities: Evidence from Amsterdam"
Milena Almagro and Tomás Domínguez-Iino
The replication package for this paper is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14807135. The authors were granted an exemption to publish parts of their data because either access to these data is restricted or the authors do not have the right to republish them. Therefore, the replication package only includes the codes and the parts of the data that are not subject to the exemption. However, the authors provided the Journal with (or assisted the Journal to obtain) temporary access to the restricted data. The Journal checked the provided and restricted data and the codes for their ability to reproduce the results in the paper and approved online appendices.
By clicking the "Accept" button or continuing to browse our site, you agree to first-party and session-only cookies being stored on your device. Cookies are used to optimize your experience and anonymously analyze website performance and traffic.